Chapter 01: Extropians
mid-1990s – 2000 — When transhumanism met mailing-list accelerationism
foomflops
A sourced timeline of Eliezer Yudkowsky’s AI predictions, their deadlines, and how they resolved.
Follow each prediction from its original source through its deadline and resolution. Every prediction and chapter has a permanent, shareable page with citations.
Source audit
Neural networks are not enough; nothing visible happens before FOOM; AGI reaches FOOM in hours; and modest compute can be sufficient. See the latest dated statement located that still supports each thesis, followed by later qualifications and the evidence.
New source audit
Yudkowsky’s 2021–23 account predicts apparent alignment on weaker systems, concealed failure as capabilities rise, and a terminal first failure—not repeated warning shots that civilization can correct.
mid-1990s – 2000 — When transhumanism met mailing-list accelerationism
1999–2000 — Shock Level Four and open-source seed AI
2000–~2012 — From 'we will build Friendly AI' to early catastrophic risk warnings
2006–2012 — Debugging humanity, one very long blog post at a time
2013–2021 — those who can't build, align
2022–2025 — those who can't align, sabotage
2026 – present — the prophecy recedes; the apparatus grows
1996 → 2001; walked back.
“It's expected in 2035. (Oops, make that 2025.)”
1999 → 2010; falsified by events.
“To have a good chance of outracing nanotech, we should plan to develop a seed AI by 2010.”
1999 → 2020; falsified by events.
“The 50% point [for nanotech] may be 2010, or earlier. … AI at 2020 CRNS.”
2000 → 2023; falsified by events.
“Regardless of whether neural networks are Necessary, they are certainly Not Sufficient.”
2001 → 2011; falsified by events.
“…a hard takeoff occurs in SIAI's or Webmind's basement sometime in the next ten years or so.”
2001 → 2008; walked back.
“…the ‘hard takeoff’ ‘seed AI’ three-hours-to-transhumanity scenario.”
2001 → 2020; falsified by events.
“2005-2020 / peak at 2008-2010”
2001 → 2010; falsified by events.
“…reaching transhumanity sometime between 2005 and 2020, probably around 2008 or 2010.”
2002 → 2023; falsified by events.
“I would call it dead certain in favor of a hard takeoff… all economic, computational… indicators point straight toward it.”
2006 → 2023; falsified by events.
“But a neural network the size of a planet, given the same examples, would have failed in the same way.”
2008 → 2023; falsified by events.
“Intelligence is about architecture… architecture is mostly about deep insights.”
2017 → 2030; still open.
“If humanity survives to 00:00 GMT, Jan 1 2030, Yudkowsky pays Caplan $200; a bet at 2:1 odds in favour of doom.”
No GDP boom before doom
2021 → 2025; falsified by events.
2022 → 2025; came true.
“I'll stand by a >16% probability of the technical capability existing by end of 2025.”
2022 → open; still open.
“…doubling our chances of survival will only take them from 0% to 0%.”
2021 → 2025; falsified by events.
“…the World-Ending Company will be able to use the same tech to build a true self-driving car, which would in the natural course of things be approved for sale a few years later after the world had ended.”
2021 → 2025; falsified by events.
“this all sure does sound "pretty darn prohibited" on my model, but I'd hope there'd be something earlier than that we could bet on.”
2021 → 2025; falsified by events.
“if the world lasts until 2035, I could perhaps see deepnets becoming as ubiquitous as computers were in… 1995? 2005? would that fulfill the terms of the Prophecy?”
2021 → 2023; hedged: couldn't lose.
“I feel like I would indeed not have the right to feel very surprised if Codex technology stagnated for the next 5 years, nor if it took a massive leap in 2 years and got ubiquitously adopted by lots of programmers.”
2021 → open; still open.
“I think my sheer impression would be that we'll get $1B/yr waifutech before we get AI freedom-of-the-road”